We do not oppose the devise or the use of the safety device called a seat belt. Our current seat belt bills in the house and senate do not mention one word about how good a seat belt is or how it would save your life, prevent an accident or injury, or reduce "social burden" or medical costs. We currently have a seat belt law that requires all citizens regardless of age to wear a seat belt; police officers are currently even empowered to stop and ticket anyone operating a motor vehicle if they observe anyone under the age of 18 not wearing a seat belt.
The enemies of Liberty apparently will not rest until the police are empowered to stop, detain, arrest, and fine or incarcerate anyone no matter their age or circumstances for simply not wearing a device. It does not take much of an imagination to realize that this power can be abused and used as a profiling tool; worst still the current version of the bill prohibits the collection of data that could be used to determine if a pattern of abuse exists.
Imagine you are seated in the audience of a public hearing listening to the enemies of Liberty arguing to mandate seat belt use for all adults coupled with primary enforcement. They bring up all the same old tired arguments about insurance, "public burden," accidents, injuries, and fatalities. That forcing everyone to wear a seat belt bill with threat of primary enforcement will solve every safety woe facing South Carolina. Yet they neglect the lack of secondary road maintenance that is the biggest killer of road users in South Carolina.
Notice not one word addresses the law, the question of arrest, incarceration, or fine. Seldom will the enemies of Liberty venture into the battlefield of law because they are woefully unprepared. They do not address why we should be arrested, incarcerated, or fined when we do not wear a seat belt. They only say that we might get into an accident, and we might be injured, and we might sustain greater injuries if we are not wearing the device, and we might not have sufficient medical coverage, and we might cost the taxpayers a little more money. It is interesting how we are not taxpayers when this argument comes up. The enemies of Liberty will argue anything but the law itself.
We choose to argue the law not the device; as we begin we remind the legislators of the old saying: "Figures don't lie, but liars can figure." We also remind them that our Highway Department and other opponents have a great deal of practice at figuring. We point out that not one word of testimony from our opponents addressed the issue we are here to address, the question of arrest, incarceration, or fine of adults who simply choose not to wear a seat belt when operating a motor vehicle. We also point out that on every level federal, state, and local laws recognize the principle of adult responsibility and in many instances specify a particular age when these responsibilities are incurred. The age of responsibility on the federal level is addressed in regards to service to country and other areas; to serve as president you must be 35, to serve as a senator you must be 30, and to serve as a member of the house you must be 25. The age of responsibility in South Carolina is also addressed; to drink or serve as a member of the house you must be 21, to serve as a state senator you must be 25, and to serve as governor you must be 30. Why is this one particular device so important that regardless of age and experience adults must be mandated under threat of arrest, incarceration, or fine to use it? Even if we believe that every word spoken by our opponents are 100% true is that sufficient warrant to punish adults that simply do not want to use this device ALL of the time?
So for the record: ABATE of South Carolina has no position on the device, wear it if you will or don't if you won't.
If you are still confused then think about it the next time you have a drink or smoke a cigarette. The law says that if you are under 21 and you have a drink or you are under 18 and smoke a cigarette then you can be arrested, incarcerated, or fined. The device is the alcohol or the cigarette. Try to come up with some good arguments as to why you as an adult should drink or smoke, then think about some reasons why you as an adult should be arrested if you do either or both. I doubt you can find any good reasons to drink or smoke but I would also suggest that you are unlikely come up with sound arguments as to why you should be arrested, incarcerated, or fined for using these devices. It is your prerogative to decide on what devices you should use or not use; you should only be threatened with punishment when you use devices against others.
My life has been a dedicated blend of open road adventure and relentless advocacy for motorcyclists’ rights. I'm "Fast Fred" Ruddock, and my journey on two wheels began as a teenager. Over the years, I’ve owned 13 Harleys and several other motorcycles, machines that were far more than just transportation. They represented a freedom that I have fought to protect. Recognizing the power of information, I earned a Bachelor of Science in Computer Science, skills I immediately put to use for the movement.
My commitment to advocacy led me to a complete immersion in ABATE of South Carolina (ABATE of SC). I quickly moved through the ranks, starting by developing the ABATE of SC website in 2001 and serving as the Berkeley/Dorchester Chapter Coordinator. This progressed to serving as Lowcountry Area Coordinator, where I successfully shifted our local focus decisively toward rights and rapidly increased membership. From 2003 to 2007, I served as the State Coordinator, where I helped coordinate several key legislative victories, including the passage of the Purple Heart license tag bill and the successful repeal of unnecessary handlebar height restrictions. My primary strategic goal was always to achieve widespread political influence by organizing a chapter in every single county.
On the national front, I extended my influence by serving as the State Representative on the board of the Motorcycle Riders Foundation (MRF) for several years during the 2000s. This role ensured that the concerns of South Carolina riders were directly represented in critical federal legislative discussions. Crucially, I also worked to shape public opinion: I wrote articles related to motorcycle rights for various magazines and had a small column in Easyriders magazine for several years, using media to educate riders nationwide on the issues impacting their freedom.
My activism was not only about lobbying but also direct action and constitutional challenges. I participated in the Myrtle Beach civil disobedience against local helmet laws, contributing to the legal groundwork for the eventual overturning of that restrictive law through a landmark SC Supreme Court case. I also challenged helmet laws personally, fighting three tickets in court as an act of civil disobedience in several states. I lobbied in multiple state capitols with me friends across the country. My dedication continued after my ABATE leadership, as I served as the Director of Bikers Of Less Tolerance (BOLT) of South Carolina.
Today, while I also enjoy working as a river guide and sharing my travel adventures, my legacy remains rooted in the fight for motorcycle freedom. I have spent decades on the front lines, utilizing both political strategy, legal challenges, and national media to protect the rights of every person on two wheels.
I'm a professional whitewater guide and kayak instructor. I grew up rafting, sailing, and surfing, and I spend my North American summers guiding on world-class whitewater. I have spent much of my adult life riding motorcycles and paddling kayaks.
Raft with me: Check out Fast Fred Rafts for details.
Got questions about solo travel, Latin America, or budgeting? I'd be happy to give you honest answers!
My Travel & Video Gear: Curious how I travel so light? Dig into my Amazon Shop for an inside look at the gear I carry. (Purchases via this shop provide a small commission at no extra cost to you.)
Tip Jar: Your support helps fund the next adventure of cup of coffee!